In prilaženom video footage clearly shows that the postal clerk refuses to deliver registered mail

Home AUDIO SURVEY: ĐULA RUŠINOVIĆ-SUNARA and psychiatrists Miroslav GORETA / HOW STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF CROATIAN PERFORM THE GENOCIDE OF CROATIAN PEOPLE AND OTHER CITIZENS OF CROATIAN porto FORMER JUDGE AND ANTE Unković JULIJANA STIPIŠIĆ, THROUGH MUNICIPAL COURT SPLIT enforcer who does not exist / IC-362 / 08 Parallel porto Justice SAO USKOK PUSD - administrative fees and II police station Split Traffic Split Zagreb Holding porto Ltd. Raiffeisenbank Austria porto dd, Croatian media
Croatian Post has a very important role in terms of serious violations of the legal rights of citizens, in particular plays an important role in the requisitions of the same. Croatian Post has completely "at your service" to all government employees, primarily in the State Attorney's Office, Anti-Corruption Office, all courts Croatian judiciary, the police and so on. Personally I have a very large number of hard evidence of direct porto interference in the judicial HP and other procedures at the expense of me as a party. I do not know the number of complaints and warnings, which I forwarded to the respective post office, either orally, in writing porto or by e-mail.
In prilaženom video footage clearly shows that the postal clerk refuses to deliver registered mail on the basis of information on shipments (yellow notification of arrival of the consignment) and that the same officer refuses to make a record of it.
The same video is evidence porto of unauthorized search and the use of identity cards of citizens, by postal officials. Although Croatian Post Inc., by the nature of the work, it has a collection of names and surnames of many Croatian citizens and home addresses of the same, that is to find and record numbers of ID cards without authorization and totally superfluous when performing ordinary activities listed address. Accordingly, here are answers Croatian-mail to a complaint regarding unauthorized legitimaranja citizens:
we wish to inform you that HP Croatian Post has a vested with public authority, and proving the identity of the sender, recipient or other authorized person proves the following documents (Article 49 of the General Conditions for the provision of universal postal services):
Please note that in accordance with Article 31 of the Law on Postal Services (Official Gazette 144/12) the relationship between the Croatian Post as providers and users of regulated agreement on accession to the treaty without the written form and that the user accepts the terms of the Act, as well as our general terms and conditions.
Thus, it is evident that the concerned states that HP has entrusted with public authority for legitimizing citizens, whatever that means. porto However, it does not specify who is "entrusted with public authority" that the post office. Otherwise, the Law on Identity Cards, Law on protection of personal data of citizens, the Law on Police Duties and powers, etc., that are not lists still not given the opportunity to any mail that legitimizes citizens on any grounds. So, here we are talking about unauthorized use of personal identification card numbers, which are particularly difficult violated the rights of citizens in terms of the said Act on the protection of personal data of citizens. The said Article 49 of the General Conditions for the provision of universal postal service is actually a serious criminal offense in terms of the general conditions, rules or office can be made in a way that must comply with the laws to which they relate. As already stated, there is no law that Croatian Post Inc. empowers citizens to be legitimized when taking the recommended mail to a postal counters. So, this provision is posted Croatia invented for her for some reason need a database of citizens' identity card numbers. So now the Croatian Post has completed all the terms of names and surnames of citizens and in terms of citizens' residential address (this ex officio), and their numbers IDs (by this unauthorized use). What works with HP so the data collected? Answer: It is not known but it is certainly contrary to the interests of citizens.
One recent porto first chance delivery postman at my front door says that he personally damaging letter from the police department of Split and Dalmatia, and the letter was returned with a record that PUSD. However, personal insight into the written messages in PUSD, I found that it was not damaged in any part and I requested that we be provided with a copy.
Here it can be seen that there is no damage porto to the consignment, means the record is falsely stated that the item is damaged porto in a length of 4 cm. On this occasion I will not go into all the other details. Why is PUSD immediately withdrew the consignment is not known right now. There are assumptions on my part why it was done but these are just guesses, so not about that now.
Another example porto of the second is related to large items of correspondence, porto B4 format (250 353), with no postmark date and without any other official insignia. The same consignment was we tucked into a mailbox and a 90% same peeked out of the mailbox. The consignment were important writings of the Supreme Court. Same kind nepečatiranu shipment is received and the Municipal Court in Split, which is determined by direct inspection in the case file. It was never made clear who is hooked there pošil